She said: “ GDPR, for example displays two contradictory trends. She also cites the much-praised General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force in May next year, as a well-intentioned law that may have adverse side effects. Regulation is always lagging behind new technological and market challenges, even as it struggles to keep up.Īs Maria Macocinschi, who is studying for a doctorate in law at the University of Turku in Finland, notes: “The rigidity in revising and adapting the laws to the fast technological and economic developments is creating frustrations not only for consumers but also for companies.” Of course, constant fluctuations in both technological and socio-economic contexts make achieving these grand aims a challenge. The broad scope of privacy and data protection laws is generally to ensure the free flow of personal data between the member states, while their ultimate purpose is to regulate how such data should be processed in order to maintain a balance between the various interests of the personal data ecosystem. The worst case scenario? Potential stagnation for technological innovation. The consequences of this legal overreach can themselves be far-reaching – not just to personal privacy, but to technological innovation as a whole, if creators and those with grand ideas feel stifled by the competing needs of overlapping legislation. ![]() Most privacy and data protection laws have the noble aims of making us and our personal information safer – but overreach in the detail is a common side effect of attempts to do the right thing. The starting point for most privacy and data protection laws is creating a safer environment for all of us and our personal data – but the inevitable overreach often has far-reaching consequences
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |